IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Crowley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Valley Jr. Warriors EHLP 39 9 11 20 0.513 0.0588 0.0612 0.1156 0.1204
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 8 3 2 5 0.625 0.1444 0.1503 0.3058 0.3182
2017-18 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 44 8 13 21 0.477 0.0624 0.0604 0.1620 0.1568
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SO 28 1 4 5 0.179
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 28 1 4 5 0.179
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 FR 26 4 4 8 0.308
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 26 4 4 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2018-19 · Franklin Pierce
+273.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32286
Forward overall
#1607
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braeden Doust
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Chenard-Poirier
Babson · 2005-06
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eemil Rautio
Marian · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.