IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Chenard-Poirier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-01-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 60 1 20 21 0.350 0.1174 0.1122 0.3239 0.3094
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 5 2 0 2 0.400
2008-09 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 27 2 7 9 0.333
2007-08 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 22 3 5 8 0.364
2006-07 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 29 4 9 13 0.448
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2006-07 · Babson
+323.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14829
Defenseman overall
#1405
Defenseman born in 1986
#1721
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Abramson
Lake Forest · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Annunziato
Lake Forest · 2011-12
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Murphy
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.