IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Torkoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-29 Country: Canada
Post
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 40 3 8 11 0.275 0.0635 0.0649 0.1346 0.1375
2025-26 Seahawks Hockey EHL 40 5 10 15 0.375 0.0866 0.0836 0.1835 0.1771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43393
Forward overall
#2816
Forward born in 2005
#1825
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

Post Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Engdahl
0.24
actual FR PPG at Post
Holden Beckett
0.38
actual FR PPG at Post
Michael Karas
0.32
actual FR PPG at Post
Nathan McDevitt
0.00
actual FR PPG at Post

D2/3 Comparables

Navarone Copley
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Lambert
New England College · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Bezio
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.