IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cyrus Keeling Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-28 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 36 3 7 10 0.278 0.0642 0.0669 0.1359 0.1417
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2024-25 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2023-24 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2022-23 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2021-22 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2020-21 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47524
Forward overall
#3191
Forward born in 2005
#2154
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Gray
Williams · 2011-12
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eliott Mikesch
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Chouinard
Keene State · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.