IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maxx Owens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Boston Jr. Eagles EHL 37 2 6 8 0.216 0.0499 0.0500 0.1058 0.1061
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 1 1 2 0.111
2024-25 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 1 1 2 0.111
2023-24 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 1 1 2 0.111
2022-23 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 1 1 2 0.111
2021-22 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 1 1 2 0.111
2020-21 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 1 1 2 0.111

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21241
Defenseman overall
#3594
Defenseman born in 2005
#2518
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Trumble
Amherst · 2008-09
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Haskell
Hobart · 2012-13
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Stevenson
Elmira · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.