← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Matthew Goyette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-05-15 Country: Canada
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Cornwall Colts CCHL 51 6 21 27 0.529 0.1148 0.1295 0.4055 0.4575
2025-26 Brampton Steelheads OHL 29 1 7 8 0.276 0.1596 0.1676 0.7224 0.7586
2026-27 Brampton Steelheads OHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9313
Defenseman overall
#629
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

OJHL 2018-19
0.53
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
OJHL 2017-18
0.65
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
WHL 2021-22
0.30
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2008-09
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.