IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Axel Favreau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Center DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Amherst
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 27 2 0 2 0.074 0.0149 0.0149 0.0339 0.0339
2022-23 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 2 4 6 0.188 0.0377 0.0377 0.0857 0.0857
2023-24 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 7 7 14 0.438 0.0880 0.0880 0.2001 0.2001
2024-25 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 23 8 13 21 0.913 0.1836 0.1836 0.4175 0.4175
2025-26 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 33 8 24 32 0.970 0.1950 0.1950 0.4434 0.4434
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23304
Forward overall
#198
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

Amherst Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Keenan Hodgson
1.11
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Mike Moher
0.50
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Nicholas Bondra
0.71
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Tyler Bourque
0.00
actual FR PPG at Amherst

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Sawicky
Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Quigley
Trinity · 2006-07
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David McNab
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.