← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Wilkinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 28 3 2 5 0.179 0.0359 0.0359 0.0817 0.0817
2024-25 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 29 12 14 26 0.897 0.1803 0.1803 0.4100 0.4100
2025-26 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 29 15 15 30 1.034 0.2080 0.2080 0.4731 0.4731
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24634
Forward overall
#218
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.38
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.46
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.15
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2008-09
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2009-10
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.