IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Mceleney

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Assumption
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Canterbury NE-Prep 30 11 21 32 1.067 0.2113 0.2113 0.4860 0.4860
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15549
Forward overall
#97
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Assumption Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Xander Mavrogiannis
0.38
actual FR PPG at Assumption
Kyle LoNigro
0.00
actual FR PPG at Assumption
Robert Holyoke
0.68
actual FR PPG at Assumption
Ronny Paragallo
0.55
actual FR PPG at Assumption

D2/3 Comparables

Artur Terchiyev
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Hogan
Utica · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will LeNeave
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.