← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Lawson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-01-11 Country: USA
2005 · Round 7, Pick #198  ·  Carolina Hurricanes Carolina Hurricanes
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 46 5 21 26 0.565 0.4201 0.4020 2.1090 2.0180
2005-06 Tri-City Storm USHL 49 9 13 22 0.449 0.2649 0.2633 1.3485 1.3404
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 38 4 18 22 0.579
2008-09 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 40 4 19 23 0.575
2007-08 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 45 5 21 26 0.578
2006-07 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 38 4 15 19 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2006-07 · Notre Dame
+66.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2504
Defenseman overall
#435
Defenseman born in 1987

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2000-01
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.