← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Czuba Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Penticton Vees BCHL 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.0286 0.0318 0.1080 0.1200
2002-03 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 55 15 22 37 0.673 0.2592 0.2768
2003-04 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 51 30 32 62 1.216 0.2340 0.2403 0.7661 0.7868
2004-05 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 51 34 29 63 1.235 0.2378 0.2330 0.7785 0.7627
2005-06 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 61 60 41 101 1.656 0.3187 0.2958 1.0434 0.9684
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 SR 29 19 20 39 1.345
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 JR 19 12 5 17 0.895
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 SO 27 16 9 25 0.926
2006-07 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2006-07 · Maine
+43.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9453
Forward overall
#296
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.