IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kai Weigel

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Salve Regina
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Moorhead USHS-MN 7 0 4 4 0.571 0.0723 0.0723 0.1387 0.1387
2022-23 Moorhead USHS-MN 6 0 5 5 0.833 0.1055 0.1055 0.2023 0.2023
2023-24 Moorhead USHS-MN 4 0 3 3 0.750 0.0949 0.0949 0.1821 0.1821
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Salve Regina Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Egor Borshchev
0.20
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
Brandon Borges
0.00
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
Joel Shoemaker
0.00
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
Braden Paquette
0.33
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Selep
Nazareth · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Cusan
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Victor Bergström
Plymouth State · 2013-14
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.