| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Northern Manitoba Blizzard | MJHL | 39 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 0.487 | 0.0938 | 0.1024 | 0.3072 | 0.3354 |
| 2004-05 | Brandon Wheat Kings | WHL | 26 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.038 | 0.0187 | 0.0189 | 0.0945 | 0.0957 |
| 2005-06 | Brandon Wheat Kings | WHL | 59 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.339 | 0.1649 | 0.1593 | 0.8318 | 0.8036 |
| 2006-07 | Univ. of Manitoba | USports-M | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.111 | 0.0586 | 0.0658 | 0.3256 | 0.3657 |
| 2007-08 | Univ. of Manitoba | USports-M | 17 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.118 | 0.0620 | 0.0666 | 0.3447 | 0.3705 |
| 2008-09 | Univ. of Manitoba | USports-M | 27 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 0.481 | 0.2540 | 0.2595 | 1.4113 | 1.4420 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.