IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cash Cruitt

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Andover USHS-MN 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.1266 0.1266 0.2429 0.2429
2024-25 Andover USHS-MN 3 0 4 4 1.333 0.1688 0.1688 0.3239 0.3239
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Anthony Cipollone
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Michael Salandra
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Andon Cerbone
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Timothy Heinke
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.20
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Bandazian
Skidmore · 2005-06
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Hall
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Salmon
SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.