IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Merrick

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Ferris State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Minnetonka USHS-MN 27 0 4 4 0.148 0.0187 0.0187 0.0360 0.0360
2025-26 Minnetonka USHS-MN 30 2 5 7 0.233 0.0295 0.0295 0.0567 0.0567
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57047
Forward overall
#5730
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Ferris State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brenden MacLaren
NAHL 2016-17
0.17
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
Bradley Marek
USHL 2018-19
0.53
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
Matt Corbet
AJHL 2021-22
0.25
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
Jack Silich
USHL 2021-22
0.30
actual FR PPG at Ferris State

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Thornton
Castleton · 2010-11
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Munro
St. Olaf · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Gaudry
Castleton · 2009-10
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.