← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Silich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 43 8 7 15 0.349 0.1945 0.1945
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 49 6 11 17 0.347 0.2132 0.2132 1.0220 1.0220
2021-22 USHL 57 6 3 9 0.158 0.0971 0.0980 0.4652 0.4693
2022-23 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 54 24 20 44 0.815 0.3035 0.2972 1.1872 1.1624
2023-24 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 41 12 7 19 0.463 0.1726 0.1611 0.6752 0.6301
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA 25 3 3 6 0.240
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA 20 3 3 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · Ferris State
+62.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28623
Forward overall
#1643
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.