| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Red Deer Rebels | WHL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2006-07 | Red Deer Rebels | WHL | 62 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.048 | 0.0235 | 0.0247 | 0.1181 | 0.1241 |
| 2007-08 | — | WHL | 23 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.217 | 0.1057 | 0.1057 | 0.5306 | 0.5305 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Southern Maine | D3 | HockeyEast | FR | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.750 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.