← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Betts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-05-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Red Deer Rebels WHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Red Deer Rebels WHL 62 2 1 3 0.048 0.0235 0.0247 0.1181 0.1241
2007-08 WHL 23 3 2 5 0.217 0.1057 0.1057 0.5306 0.5305
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2001-02 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 4 1 2 3 0.750

NCAAe Rankings

#31150
Forward overall
#1200
Forward born in 1989
#1984
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2015-16
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2015-16
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.