IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brooke Ahbe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 60 14 22 36 0.600 0.1804 0.1730 — —
2013-14 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 38 7 13 20 0.526 0.1583 0.1438 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W JR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2015-16 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W SO 21 3 3 6 0.286
2014-15 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W FR 29 4 2 6 0.207
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2014-15 · Dartmouth
+55.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5126
Forward overall
#171
Forward born in 1996
#1768
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kylie Hanley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Audrey McClurg
Concordia · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kayson Ruegge
Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ellie Burris
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.