IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Cash Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — USHL 55 8 8 16 0.291 0.1716 0.1657 0.8737 0.8438
2001-02 Topeka Scarecrows USHL 25 2 2 4 0.160 0.0944 0.0865 0.4805 0.4402
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2004-05 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2003-04 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 17 2 6 8 0.471
2002-03 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 26 4 8 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2002-03 · St. Scholastica
+356.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40369
Forward overall
#831
Forward born in 1981
#3509
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Curran
University of New England · 2021-22
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Bloder
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Drapluk
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.