← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Nash Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-22 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Alberta · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 59 6 9 15 0.254 0.1237 0.1237 0.6237 0.6237
2020-21 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 24 4 9 13 0.542 0.2635 0.2635 1.3292 1.3292
2021-22 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 60 17 21 38 0.633 0.3081 0.3072 1.5539 1.5492
2022-23 WHL 64 20 24 44 0.688 0.3345 0.3179 1.6869 1.6031
2023-24 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 50 21 35 56 1.120 0.5449 0.4910 2.7481 2.4762
2024-25 Univ. of Alberta USports-M 27 8 7 15 0.556 0.2931 0.3162 1.6285 1.7568
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 32 5 5 10 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2025-26 · Arizona State
-5.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9850
Forward overall
#429
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.