IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 48 1 5 6 0.125 0.0608 0.0608 0.3063 0.3063
2020-21 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 16 2 2 4 0.250 0.1216 0.1216 0.6126 0.6126
2021-22 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 37 0 8 8 0.216 0.0554 0.0546 0.1602 0.1578
2022-23 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 54 7 23 30 0.556 0.1423 0.1330 0.4118 0.3850
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Chatham D1 — SR 13 2 5 7 0.538
2019-20 Chatham D1 — JR 23 3 11 14 0.609
2018-19 Chatham D1 — SO 25 6 7 13 0.520

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13360
Defenseman overall
#2589
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin O'Connor
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Isaac Barrett
Utica · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Nikac
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.