← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Schreifels Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-04-16 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
Sacred Heart
Verbal NEWHA D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.12
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1251
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.29
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3033
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
82%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Andover High USHS-MN-W 31 2 2 4 0.129 0.0195 0.0209
2024-25 Andover High USHS-MN-W 31 7 18 25 0.806 0.1218 0.1256
2025-26 Andover High USHS-MN-W 30 14 11 25 0.833 0.1258 0.1248
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac
Ebba Strandberg SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.333 Maine
Taylor Flaherty USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 North Dakota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Brooklyn Riley 2023-24 · 0.37 PPG 0.806 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Amelia McQuay 2023-24 · 0.71 PPG 0.423 Bethel MIAC
Lizzy Hamel 2022-23 · 0.96 PPG 0.316 Colby NESCAC
Alexis Oliveira 2023-24 · 0.50 PPG 0.609 Alvernia MAC
Afton Hulke 2022-23 · 0.96 PPG 0.308 Bethel MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.