← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryder Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Portland Winterhawks WHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Portland Winterhawks WHL 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0347 0.0347 0.1750 0.1750
2021-22 Portland Winterhawks WHL 58 1 17 18 0.310 0.1510 0.1587 0.7603 0.7989
2022-23 Portland Winterhawks WHL 57 3 16 19 0.333 0.1622 0.1629 0.8167 0.8201
2023-24 Portland Winterhawks WHL 67 1 21 22 0.328 0.1598 0.1526 0.8047 0.7684
2024-25 Portland Winterhawks WHL 67 9 14 23 0.343 0.1670 0.1505 0.8412 0.7583
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC FR 34 1 9 10 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Miami
+105.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9366
Defenseman overall
#2077
Defenseman born in 2004
#1718
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.