← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Whynott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Calgary Hitmen WHL 20 2 3 5 0.250 0.1216 0.1216 0.6126 0.6126
2021-22 Calgary Hitmen WHL 55 5 10 15 0.273 0.1327 0.1383 0.6682 0.6964
2022-23 Calgary Hitmen WHL 66 5 12 17 0.258 0.1253 0.1247 0.6312 0.6283
2023-24 Tri-City Americans WHL 64 16 17 33 0.516 0.2508 0.2373 1.2634 1.1954
2024-25 Tri-City Americans WHL 67 26 34 60 0.895 0.4357 0.3890 2.1942 1.9590
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowling Green D1 CCHA FR 28 2 2 4 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Bowling Green
-49.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15097
Forward overall
#724
Forward born in 2004
#820
in WHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.