IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Whynott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Calgary Hitmen WHL 20 2 3 5 0.250 0.1216 0.1216 0.6134 0.6134
2021-22 Calgary Hitmen WHL 55 5 10 15 0.273 0.1327 0.1383 0.6691 0.6973
2022-23 Calgary Hitmen WHL 66 5 12 17 0.258 0.1253 0.1247 0.6321 0.6292
2023-24 Tri-City Americans WHL 64 16 17 33 0.516 0.2508 0.2373 1.2651 1.1971
2024-25 Tri-City Americans WHL 67 26 34 60 0.895 0.4357 0.3890 2.1973 1.9617
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowling Green D1 CCHA FR 28 2 2 4 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Bowling Green
-49.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15537
Forward overall
#746
Forward born in 2004
#573
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake McAlpine
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Clarke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.