| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Medicine Hat Tigers | WHL | 15 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.200 | 0.0973 | 0.0973 | 0.4901 | 0.4901 |
| 2021-22 | Medicine Hat Tigers | WHL | 65 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.292 | 0.1422 | 0.1464 | 0.7162 | 0.7374 |
| 2022-23 | Medicine Hat Tigers | WHL | 58 | 18 | 19 | 37 | 0.638 | 0.3103 | 0.3050 | 1.5630 | 1.5363 |
| 2023-24 | Medicine Hat Tigers | WHL | 12 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.833 | 0.4054 | 0.3785 | 2.0418 | 1.9063 |
| 2024-25 | Medicine Hat Tigers | WHL | 65 | 19 | 32 | 51 | 0.785 | 0.3817 | 0.3360 | 1.9225 | 1.6922 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Michigan Tech | D1 | CCHA | FR | 28 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0.321 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.