← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rylen Roersma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 17 1 1 2 0.118 0.0572 0.0572 0.2886 0.2886
2021-22 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 68 19 10 29 0.426 0.2075 0.2191 1.0465 1.1050
2022-23 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 65 19 17 36 0.554 0.2694 0.2719 1.3589 1.3714
2023-24 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 64 20 38 58 0.906 0.4409 0.4232 2.2235 2.1344
2024-25 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 58 12 18 30 0.517 0.2516 0.2281 1.2691 1.1504
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 31 9 13 22 0.710
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2025-26 · Alaska Fairbanks
+170.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14705
Forward overall
#696
Forward born in 2004
#545
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.