IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Diamond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Omaha Lancers USHL 32 13 10 23 0.719 0.4418 0.4474 2.1177 2.1447
2008-09 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 45 42 34 76 1.689 0.5073 0.4883 1.1561 1.1127
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 33 14 10 24 0.727
2011-12 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 37 25 22 47 1.270
2010-11 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 33 11 10 21 0.636
2009-10 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 32 9 3 12 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2009-10 · Maine
-7.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5961
Forward overall
#220
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean David
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.