← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rhett Ravndahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-26 Country: Canada
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Portland Winterhawks WHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Portland Winterhawks WHL 29 1 3 4 0.138 0.0671 0.0697 0.3384 0.3515
2023-24 Portland Winterhawks WHL 55 1 6 7 0.127 0.0619 0.0612 0.3124 0.3091
2024-25 Kamloops Blazers WHL 60 3 8 11 0.183 0.0892 0.0835 0.4498 0.4210
2025-26 Kamloops Blazers WHL 55 4 12 16 0.291 0.1415 0.1259 0.7138 0.6351
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16063
Defenseman overall
#3010
Defenseman born in 2005
#1433
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.