← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Behm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-18 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 3, Pick #66  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 WHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0811 0.0929 0.4090 0.4686
2023-24 Kamloops Blazers WHL 68 12 19 31 0.456 0.2218 0.2432 1.1186 1.2264
2024-25 Kamloops Blazers WHL 59 31 35 66 1.119 0.5442 0.5676 2.7447 2.8626
2025-26 Kamloops Blazers WHL 67 38 48 86 1.284 0.6245 0.6224 3.1496 3.1391
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5612
Forward overall
#84
Forward born in 2007
#136
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

OHL 2021-22
0.80
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2021-22
0.38
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
NAHL 2012-13
0.22
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2024-25
0.29
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.