← New Search ↗ Social Card

Linden Burrett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-02-06 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Surrey Eagles BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Surrey Eagles BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Vernon Vipers BCHL 36 1 4 5 0.139 0.0535 0.0570 0.2021 0.2152
2024-25 Calgary Hitmen WHL 40 1 5 6 0.150 0.0730 0.0718 0.3681 0.3620
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 64 8 27 35 0.547 0.2661 0.2493 1.3419 1.2573
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7163
Defenseman overall
#1506
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL-J20 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2023-24
0.25
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2017-18
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
AJHL 2015-16
0.31
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2021-22
1.476 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2003-04
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.