← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alisher Sarkenov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-15 Country: Kazakhstan
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Snezhnye Barsy Astana MHL-RU 52 12 13 25 0.481 0.2446 0.2639 1.2883 1.3902
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 47 21 20 41 0.872 0.4244 0.4370 2.1404 2.2039
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10158
Forward overall
#234
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2017-18
0.12
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2021-22
0.95
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
AJHL 2019-20
1.26
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2015-16
0.81
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.444 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.