← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alisher Sarkenov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-15 Country: Kazakhstan
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Snezhnye Barsy Astana MHL-RU 52 12 13 25 0.481 0.2446 0.2639 1.2879 1.3898
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 47 21 20 41 0.872 0.4244 0.4370 2.1308 2.1940
2026-27 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 7 3 1 4 0.571 0.2780 0.2780 1.3958 1.3958
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10355
Forward overall
#250
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
OJHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
AJHL 2020-21
1.26
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.95
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2014-15
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2020-21
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.