← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Elliott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-14 Country: Canada
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Surrey Eagles BCHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3853 0.4106 1.4553 1.5510
2023-24 Surrey Eagles BCHL 46 4 8 12 0.261 0.1005 0.1025 0.3797 0.3873
2024-25 Surrey Eagles BCHL 21 7 9 16 0.762 0.2936 0.2847 1.1088 1.0751
2025-26 Wenatchee Wild WHL 45 5 11 16 0.356 0.1730 0.1543 0.8725 0.7782
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29819
Forward overall
#1756
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.89
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.40
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
AJHL 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
AJHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.