IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Perlini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-14 Country: England
2010 · Round 6, Pick #192  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 48 38 19 57 1.188 0.1983 0.2255 0.4944 0.5623
2007-08 Ohio Blue Jackets USHL 19 1 4 5 0.263 0.1553 0.1650 0.7905 0.8398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 39 9 22 31 0.795
2010-11 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 38 18 12 30 0.789
2009-10 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 20 7 5 12 0.600
2008-09 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 26 2 1 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2008-09 · Michigan State
-28.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17144
Forward overall
#671
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Dawson Cook
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Ahlgren
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kim Hilmersson
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Atkinson
Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.