← New Search ↗ Social Card

Xavier Cormier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-30 Country: Canada
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Québec Remparts QMJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 QMJHL 57 4 8 12 0.210 0.1034 0.1093 0.5621 0.5940
2019-20 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 60 12 23 35 0.583 0.2866 0.2866 1.5576 1.5576
2020-21 QMJHL 32 14 18 32 1.000 0.4913 0.4913 2.6703 2.6703
2021-22 Rimouski Océanic QMJHL 53 29 39 68 1.283 0.6303 0.5705 3.4260 3.1011
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5602
Forward overall
#223
Forward born in 2001
#190
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2024-25
0.31
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
QMJHL 2024-25
0.40
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
OHL 2016-17
0.47
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
USHL 2020-21
0.40
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.