IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexis Cournoyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-19 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 5, Pick #145  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
Signed Professionally
Brock Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 67 13 15 28 0.418 0.2053 0.1994 1.1159 1.0841
2023-24 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 51 11 15 26 0.510 0.1964 0.1857 0.7419 0.7016
2024-25 Brock Univ. USports-M 25 4 4 8 0.320 0.1688 0.1849 0.9379 1.0271
2025-26 Brock Univ. USports-M 28 5 11 16 0.571 0.3015 0.3139 1.6748 1.7434
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22550
Forward overall
#1206
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Miller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.