IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexis Cournoyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-19 Country: Canada
2025 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #145  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 67 13 15 28 0.418 0.2078 0.2019 1.1145 1.0827
2023-24 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 51 11 15 26 0.510 0.1899 0.1796 0.7428 0.7025
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28596
Forward overall
#1642
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Duston Hebebrand
Adrian · 2010-11
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peyton Frantti
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Schaly
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.