IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Ménard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 32 0 5 5 0.156 0.0767 0.0767 0.4171 0.4171
2021-22 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 64 5 36 41 0.641 0.3147 0.3298 1.7106 1.7928
2022-23 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 65 12 36 48 0.739 0.3628 0.3625 1.9720 1.9704
2023-24 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 56 3 22 25 0.446 0.2193 0.2083 1.1920 1.1322
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 40 5 18 23 0.575 0.2825 0.2544 1.5354 1.3829
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3672
Defenseman overall
#897
Defenseman born in 2004
#601
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Liscio
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.