← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Mercier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-22 Country: Canada
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 42 8 12 20 0.476 0.2340 0.2623 1.2716 1.4253
2022-23 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 54 12 10 22 0.407 0.2002 0.2146 1.0879 1.1662
2023-24 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 61 16 28 44 0.721 0.3544 0.3624 1.9261 1.9698
2024-25 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 64 30 34 64 1.000 0.4913 0.4783 2.6703 2.5996
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 63 27 36 63 1.000 0.4913 0.4551 2.6703 2.4733
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6924
Forward overall
#232
Forward born in 2005
#254
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.83
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
BCHL 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
BCHL 2013-14
0.40
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
BCHL 2018-19
0.31
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.