IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Théo Lemieux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.4913 0.5409 2.6696 2.9393
2022-23 — QMJHL 54 6 9 15 0.278 0.1365 0.1436 0.7416 0.7803
2023-24 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 67 2 30 32 0.478 0.2346 0.2353 1.2750 1.2786
2024-25 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 63 7 25 32 0.508 0.2495 0.2379 1.3559 1.2931
2025-26 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 63 4 24 28 0.444 0.2183 0.1979 1.1864 1.0753
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5346
Defenseman overall
#1343
Defenseman born in 2005
#761
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Stewart
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Rein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Bellant
Adrian · 2017-18
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.