← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Dépatie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-08-19 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 59 2 13 15 0.254 0.1249 0.1334 0.6786 0.7247
2024-25 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 63 5 28 33 0.524 0.2573 0.2621 1.3983 1.4246
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 62 14 30 44 0.710 0.3487 0.3388 1.8946 1.8408
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4050
Defenseman overall
#844
Defenseman born in 2006
#644
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2014-15
0.42
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
SHL-J20 2022-23
0.09
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
BCHL 2015-16
0.15
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHL 2017-18
0.35
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2023-24
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2007-08
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.