← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Chandler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-01 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 5, Pick #133  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 25 3 7 10 0.400 0.1965 0.2167 1.0678 1.1777
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 64 13 19 32 0.500 0.2457 0.2589 1.3348 1.4065
2025-26 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 62 20 32 52 0.839 0.4121 0.4148 2.2390 2.2535
2026-27 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 6 1 5 6 1.000 0.4913 0.4913 2.6696 2.6696
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15491
Forward overall
#453
Forward born in 2007
#543
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2024-25
0.72
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
QMJHL 2023-24
0.94
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
BCHL 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2018-19
0.38
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.