← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Chandler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-01 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 5, Pick #133  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 25 3 7 10 0.400 0.1965 0.2167 1.0681 1.1780
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 64 13 19 32 0.500 0.2457 0.2589 1.3352 1.4070
2025-26 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 62 20 32 52 0.839 0.4121 0.4148 2.2396 2.2541
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15217
Forward overall
#421
Forward born in 2007
#528
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.72
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2022-23
0.03
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
OJHL 2013-14
0.28
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2012-13
0.59
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.