← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt DeMelis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 53 17 26 43 0.811 0.2981 0.3099 0.8563 0.8903
2018-19 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 58 14 24 38 0.655 0.3865 0.3699 1.9678 1.8831
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast GR 23 2 6 8 0.348
2022-23 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 35 4 6 10 0.286
2021-22 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 39 4 8 12 0.308
2020-21 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 21 2 5 7 0.333
2019-20 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 34 8 5 13 0.382
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · Northeastern
+29.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10809
Forward overall
#487
Forward born in 1999
#960
in USHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.