← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eddy Doyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-11-08 Country: Canada
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 54 2 7 9 0.167 0.0819 0.0884 0.4450 0.4806
2025-26 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 59 2 16 18 0.305 0.1499 0.1548 0.8145 0.8411
2026-27 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 7 2 0 2 0.286 0.1404 0.1404 0.7627 0.7627
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14196
Defenseman overall
#1876
Defenseman born in 2007
#1275
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NAHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2016-17
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.