IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Malady Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-09-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Tri-City Storm USHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0910 0.0879 0.4282 0.4136
2010-11 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 56 3 14 17 0.304 0.1127 0.1075 0.3215 0.3067
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 4 0 1 1 0.250
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 17 1 1 2 0.118
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2011-12 · Hobart
+25.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11714
Defenseman overall
#1455
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Gerson
Utica · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Vinson
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Campbell
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.