← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rian Chudzinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-31 Country: USA
2026 · Round 3, Pick #82  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 16 1 0 1 0.062 0.0126 0.0126 0.0286 0.0286
2023-24 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 9 5 14 0.500 0.1006 0.1006 0.2286 0.2286
2024-25 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.3716 0.3754 1.8749 1.8940
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 54 21 17 38 0.704 0.3457 0.3595 1.8786 1.9535
2026-27 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 7 5 5 10 1.429 0.7019 0.7019 3.8138 3.8138
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27745
Forward overall
#948
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2016-17
0.34
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston University
WHL 2017-18
0.41
actual FR PPG at Boston University
WHL 2024-25
0.47
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.