← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rian Chudzinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-31 Country: USA
2026 · Round 3, Pick #82  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 16 1 0 1 0.062 0.0124 0.0124 0.0285 0.0285
2023-24 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 9 5 14 0.500 0.0990 0.0990 0.2278 0.2278
2024-25 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.3716 0.3754 1.8657 1.8847
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 54 21 17 38 0.704 0.3457 0.3595 1.8791 1.9541
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27340
Forward overall
#898
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.26
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2019-20
0.38
actual FR PPG at Boston University
NAHL 2013-14
0.28
actual FR PPG at Boston University
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.13
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.