← New Search ↗ Social Card

Loïk Gariepy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-06-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 58 13 16 29 0.500 0.2457 0.2733 1.3352 1.4853
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22018
Forward overall
#81
Forward born in 2009
#695
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Providence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.