| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 54 | 11 | 31 | 42 | 0.778 | 0.2897 | 0.2950 | 1.1333 | 1.1540 |
| 2025-26 | Halifax Mooseheads | QMJHL | 64 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 0.406 | 0.2020 | 0.1815 | 1.0833 | 0.9732 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.