IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Guay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-07-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Springfield Spirit NAHL 46 7 10 17 0.370 0.1464 0.1440 0.3880 0.3817
2004-05 Springfield Spirit NAHL 41 6 13 19 0.463 0.1836 0.1715 0.4865 0.4544
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SR 15 6 0 6 0.400
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 25 4 1 5 0.200
2006-07 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 22 1 1 2 0.091
2005-06 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 17 2 5 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+199.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33473
Forward overall
#945
Forward born in 1984
#3268
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy McGlynn
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Polachek
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Roginski
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.