IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Trupiano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2010-06-11 Country: USA Height: 6'1" (185 cm) Weight: 192 lbs (87 kg)
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2026-27 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.5575 0.5575 2.8123 2.8123
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Trevor Stone
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Air Force (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Average
NCAAe PPG
Chris Wilkie
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Hitchcock
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nick Schmaltz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Austin Poganski
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ethan Belchetz
OHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Jack Hextall
USHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Patrick Khodorenko
NTDP-U18 2014-15
0.51
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Ryker Lee
USHL 2023-24
0.86
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Geordan Buffoline
University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.