IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Aide Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 — NAHL 37 1 6 7 0.189 0.0695 0.0784 0.1997 0.2253
2007-08 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 37 3 7 10 0.270 0.0993 0.1072 0.2853 0.3079
2008-09 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 39 4 11 15 0.385 0.1413 0.1455 0.4059 0.4179
2009-10 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.0735 0.0727 0.2111 0.2088
2010-11 Indiana Ice USHL 53 6 9 15 0.283 0.1669 0.1502 0.8500 0.7651
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 17 1 3 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2011-12 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+130.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38747
Forward overall
#1398
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Schneider
Lawrence · 2022-23
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Enns
Marian · 2018-19
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Pickup
Concordia · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.