← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack McDonough

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 26 1 10 11 0.423 0.0536 0.0536 0.1028 0.1028
2022-23 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 27 4 11 15 0.556 0.0703 0.0703 0.1350 0.1350
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC FR 22 2 3 5 0.227

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39670
Forward overall
#2768
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.26
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
BCHL 2016-17
0.24
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
SuperElit 2021-22
0.30
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2018-19
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.